NEWSLETTER

Sign up to read weekly email newsletter

11 years 🥳 of Publication

Legal Desire Media and Insights
Donate
Search
  • Law Firm & In-house Updates
  • Deals
  • Interviews
  • Insight
  • Read to know
  • Courses
Reading: MP High Court : Minor’s ‘consent’ for sex no consent at all.
Share
Aa
Legal Desire Media and InsightsLegal Desire Media and Insights
  • Law Firm & In-house Updates
  • Deals
  • Interviews
  • Insight
  • Read to know
  • Courses
Search
  • Law Firm & In-house Updates
  • Deals
  • Interviews
  • Insight
  • Read to know
  • Courses
Follow US
Legal Desire Media & Insights
Home » Blog » MP High Court : Minor’s ‘consent’ for sex no consent at all.
Judgments

MP High Court : Minor’s ‘consent’ for sex no consent at all.

By Sugam Shine 2 Min Read
Share

Women , women rights, women security, rape, molestation are the most common headlines of Indian news stories now a days. All the governments have said that they did these or that to stop all these problems but prima faciely there is no change to be witnessed and the situation is still the same. Similarly there have been a plethora of judicial decisions related to all this topics and the MP High Court most recently given one such Important decision where they have said that “A minor’s ‘consent’ for sex is no consent while setting aside a sessions court acquittal of an accused in a child rape case.”
Earlier on April 26, 2016, a special judge in Seoni district had acquitted accused Sooraj Prasad Deharia, who was charged with rape under IPC and Pocso Act, on benefit of doubt.
The sessions court had based the acquittal on medical report, which said there was no injury on the survivor’s body, and noted that she did not raise an alarm when the assault took place. This gives sufficient reason to believe that it was consensual sex, the lower court felt.
The state government filed a revision petition and a division bench of Chief Justice Hemant Gupta and Justice V K Shukla set aside the sessions court order.
According to the school admission register and radiological examination, the girl was less than 14 years old, the judges noted, and said that even if she had consented, it couldn’t be treated as “consensual sex”. The judges said “Consent is not permissible in respect of such a victim. Hence, an offence under Section 376 IPC is disclosed.”

[embeddoc url=”https://mphc.gov.in/upload/jabalpur/MPHCJB/2016/MCRC/17099/MCRC_17099_2016_Order_07-Aug-2018_digi.pdf”]

 

You Might Also Like

The Polo/Lauren Company L.P. was granted a stay on operation of an order vacating ad-interim injunction of Tis Hazari District Court on 07th November 2023, by the Delhi High Court

Aditya Birla restrained by Delhi High Court from Infringing Trademark registered by Under Armour

Guilt Of Appellant For Murder Of Deceased Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt Supported By Circumstantial Evidence By Prosecution: Delhi HC

Supreme Court of India upholds validity of certain provisions of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA)

Committee of Creditors of Educomp Solutions Ltd. v. Ebix Singapore Pvt. Ltd: Case Note

Subscribe

Subscribe to our newsletter to get our newest articles instantly!

Don’t miss out on new posts, Subscribe to newsletter Get our latest posts and announcements in your inbox.

Sign Up For Daily Newsletter

Be keep up! Get the latest breaking news delivered straight to your inbox.

Don’t miss out on new posts, Subscribe to newsletter Get our latest posts and announcements in your inbox.

By signing up, you agree to our Terms of Use and acknowledge the data practices in our Privacy Policy. You may unsubscribe at any time.
Sugam Shine August 13, 2018
Share this Article
Facebook Twitter Email Copy Link Print
Leave a comment Leave a comment

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

YOU MAY ALSO LIKE

The Polo/Lauren Company L.P. was granted a stay on operation of an order vacating ad-interim injunction of Tis Hazari District Court on 07th November 2023, by the Delhi High Court

Brief Background The appellant, The Polo/Lauren Company L.P., filed the appeal before the Delhi High Court against the order dated…

Judgments
November 16, 2023

Aditya Birla restrained by Delhi High Court from Infringing Trademark registered by Under Armour

Two famous brands - Under Armour and Aditya Birla recently had a dispute before the Delhi High Court regarding their…

JudgmentsNews
May 4, 2023

Guilt Of Appellant For Murder Of Deceased Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt Supported By Circumstantial Evidence By Prosecution: Delhi HC

While setting aside all layers of doubt on when guilt of appellant for murder can be presumed, the Delhi High…

Judgments
November 19, 2022

Supreme Court of India upholds validity of certain provisions of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA)

The top court of India has upheld almost all the stringent provisions of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA)…

JudgmentsNews
July 27, 2022

For over 10 years, Legal Desire provides credible legal industry updates and insights across the globe.

  • About
  • Contact Us
  • Legal Marketing Service for Law Firms and Lawyers
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms & Condition
  • Cancellation/Refund Policy

Follow US: 

Legal Desire Media & Insights

For Submissions/feedbacks/sponsorships/advertisement/syndication: office@legaldesire.com

Legal Desire Media & Insights 2023

✖
Cleantalk Pixel

Removed from reading list

Undo
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Register Lost your password?