NEWSLETTER

Sign up to read weekly email newsletter

11 years 🥳 of Publication

Legal Desire Media and Insights
Donate
Search
  • Law Firm & In-house Updates
  • Deals
  • Interviews
  • Insight
  • Read to know
  • Courses
Reading: SC imposes Rs. 105 cr. fine on Pune based real estate company for environment damage.
Share
Aa
Legal Desire Media and InsightsLegal Desire Media and Insights
  • Law Firm & In-house Updates
  • Deals
  • Interviews
  • Insight
  • Read to know
  • Courses
Search
  • Law Firm & In-house Updates
  • Deals
  • Interviews
  • Insight
  • Read to know
  • Courses
Follow US
Legal Desire Media & Insights
Home » Blog » SC imposes Rs. 105 cr. fine on Pune based real estate company for environment damage.
Judgments

SC imposes Rs. 105 cr. fine on Pune based real estate company for environment damage.

By Sugam Shine 3 Min Read
Share

The Supreme Court has slapped a fine of Rs. 105 Crore on a Pune-based real estate company- Goel Ganga Developers for causing damage to the environment and building residential towers, and for thereby violating the law. The Court, however, refused to order demolition of the buildings since the homebuyers were already given possession of the flats. This judgment was given in the case of M/S. GOEL GANGA DEVELOPERS INDIA PVT. LTD V. UNION OF INDIA THROUGH SECRETARY MINISTRY OF ENVIRONMENT AND FORESTS & ORS.[CIVIL APPEAL NO. 10854 OF 2016] by Justice Deepak Gupta.
Six months time has been granted by the SC bench to the Company, for depositing the money before its registry. All assets of the Company along with its directors’ assets will be attached if it fails to comply with the order.
The Company had expanded the built-up area without any permission, and the construction done by it was also in violation of the environmental clearance that was given to the project. 738 flats and 115 shops were built by the Company at Bhagyodaya, Amrut Ganga and Ganga Towers projects on Sinhagad road in Pune. The construction of 2 shops and around 69 flats were in the final stages. It was noted by the Court that the approval given to the company for construction of the built-up area was for 57,658.42 sq meters, but the Company, in complete violation of the law, had expanded the built-up area to 1,00,002.25 sq meters.
The Court, however, had to legalise the construction after it observed the fact that most of the homebuyers in the projects belonged to middle-class families, and if the buildings were demolished, they would suffer huge monetary losses.
The Order given by the National Green Tribunal (NGT) was upheld by the Apex Court. The order concluded that the developer had violated the law and fine was imposed on the developer. It was also held by in NGT’s order that the company shall not be allowed to build the 2 buildings in which it had to construct 454 flats and was directed to give back the money with interest @ 9% per annum to the buyers.[embeddoc url=”https://www.sci.gov.in/supremecourt/2016/37233/37233_2016_Judgement_10-Aug-2018.pdf”]

You Might Also Like

The Polo/Lauren Company L.P. was granted a stay on operation of an order vacating ad-interim injunction of Tis Hazari District Court on 07th November 2023, by the Delhi High Court

Aditya Birla restrained by Delhi High Court from Infringing Trademark registered by Under Armour

Guilt Of Appellant For Murder Of Deceased Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt Supported By Circumstantial Evidence By Prosecution: Delhi HC

Supreme Court of India upholds validity of certain provisions of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA)

Committee of Creditors of Educomp Solutions Ltd. v. Ebix Singapore Pvt. Ltd: Case Note

Subscribe

Subscribe to our newsletter to get our newest articles instantly!

Don’t miss out on new posts, Subscribe to newsletter Get our latest posts and announcements in your inbox.

Sign Up For Daily Newsletter

Be keep up! Get the latest breaking news delivered straight to your inbox.

Don’t miss out on new posts, Subscribe to newsletter Get our latest posts and announcements in your inbox.

By signing up, you agree to our Terms of Use and acknowledge the data practices in our Privacy Policy. You may unsubscribe at any time.
Sugam Shine August 13, 2018
Share this Article
Facebook Twitter Email Copy Link Print
Leave a comment Leave a comment

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

YOU MAY ALSO LIKE

The Polo/Lauren Company L.P. was granted a stay on operation of an order vacating ad-interim injunction of Tis Hazari District Court on 07th November 2023, by the Delhi High Court

Brief Background The appellant, The Polo/Lauren Company L.P., filed the appeal before the Delhi High Court against the order dated…

Judgments
November 16, 2023

Aditya Birla restrained by Delhi High Court from Infringing Trademark registered by Under Armour

Two famous brands - Under Armour and Aditya Birla recently had a dispute before the Delhi High Court regarding their…

JudgmentsNews
May 4, 2023

Guilt Of Appellant For Murder Of Deceased Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt Supported By Circumstantial Evidence By Prosecution: Delhi HC

While setting aside all layers of doubt on when guilt of appellant for murder can be presumed, the Delhi High…

Judgments
November 19, 2022

Supreme Court of India upholds validity of certain provisions of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA)

The top court of India has upheld almost all the stringent provisions of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA)…

JudgmentsNews
July 27, 2022

For over 10 years, Legal Desire provides credible legal industry updates and insights across the globe.

  • About
  • Contact Us
  • Legal Marketing Service for Law Firms and Lawyers
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms & Condition
  • Cancellation/Refund Policy

Follow US: 

Legal Desire Media & Insights

For Submissions/feedbacks/sponsorships/advertisement/syndication: office@legaldesire.com

Legal Desire Media & Insights 2023

✖
Cleantalk Pixel

Removed from reading list

Undo
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Register Lost your password?