NEWSLETTER

Sign up to read weekly email newsletter

11 years 🥳 of Publication

Legal Desire Media and Insights
Donate
Search
  • Law Firm & In-house Updates
  • Deals
  • Interviews
  • Insight
  • Read to know
  • Courses
Reading: Taking action against cow vigilantism, a state subject: Centre argues before SC
Share
Aa
Legal Desire Media and InsightsLegal Desire Media and Insights
  • Law Firm & In-house Updates
  • Deals
  • Interviews
  • Insight
  • Read to know
  • Courses
Search
  • Law Firm & In-house Updates
  • Deals
  • Interviews
  • Insight
  • Read to know
  • Courses
Follow US
Legal Desire Media & Insights
Home » Blog » Taking action against cow vigilantism, a state subject: Centre argues before SC
News

Taking action against cow vigilantism, a state subject: Centre argues before SC

By Vidhi Koolwal 3 Min Read
Share

Amid the growing tensions on cow vigilantism in the country, the topic has become quite debatable with the issue being heated up during the Parliamentary discussion on the 20th July, 2017.

The Supreme Court, on hearing of a petition seeking directions for the Central and the State Government in dealing with the “Gau Rakshaks” and in removing the videos uploaded by cow vigilantes, sought a reply from the respondents on the actions taken by them.

The plea sought to get the Hon’ble Court to declare section 12 of the Gujarat Animal Prevention Act, 1954, Section 13 of Maharashtra Animal Prevention Act, 1976, and Section 15 of Karnataka Prevention of Cow Slaughter and Cattle Preservation Act, 1964, as “unconstitutional” as they provided for protection of persons acting in good faith under the Act or rules.

These rules have been time and again misused by these vigilantes for harassing the other communities.

When the respondents contended that dealing with cow vigilantism is a state subject, the bench comprising of Justice A M Khanwilkar and Justice MM Shantanagoudar reportedly stated:

“You say that law and order is a state subject and states are taking actions as per law. You don’t protect any kind of vigilantism”

This petition was brought into the court by a social activist Tehseen Poonawala, a day after the Hon’ble PM Narendra Modi condemned the man slaughtering on account of cow vigilantism.

The apex court had on April 7 sought the response of six states on the plea, filed on October 21 last year, seeking action against cow vigilantes who were allegedly indulging in violence and committing atrocities against Dalits and minorities.

In the reply the counsel on behalf of the Respondents had stated that Law and order is a state subject and Central government does not have any role into it. However, Union of India is of the view that no vigilante group has any space in the country as per procedures of law. It does not support any kind of vigilantism by private persons.

The Court granted the Respondents with a time of four weeks to file a reply in the matter.

Cow Vigilantism has been a crucial issue in the state which has filled the different communities in India with such hatred so as to take the life of those who have different ideologies of life. While the Government chose to remain quite on the issue for a long uneasy time, the statement given by the PM was criticized as being too late and too less for such a hyped matter.

You Might Also Like

October 2024 Depo Provera Lawsuit Update

Shubham Malhotra launches LawStrings Management., A New-Age Business Development Consulting Firm for the Global Legal Industry

Latham Advises Astorg Philanthropy Investments on Series A Fundraising of InHeart

Aumirah announces Comprehensive Newsletter Series on Key Legal Topics

SpiceJet Refutes Claims by KAL Airways and Kalanithi Maran, Labels Damages Claim as Baseless

Subscribe

Subscribe to our newsletter to get our newest articles instantly!

Don’t miss out on new posts, Subscribe to newsletter Get our latest posts and announcements in your inbox.

Sign Up For Daily Newsletter

Be keep up! Get the latest breaking news delivered straight to your inbox.

Don’t miss out on new posts, Subscribe to newsletter Get our latest posts and announcements in your inbox.

By signing up, you agree to our Terms of Use and acknowledge the data practices in our Privacy Policy. You may unsubscribe at any time.
Vidhi Koolwal July 21, 2017
Share this Article
Facebook Twitter Email Copy Link Print
Leave a comment Leave a comment

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

YOU MAY ALSO LIKE

October 2024 Depo Provera Lawsuit Update

Depo-Provera is a widely used contraceptive injection that has recently come under legal scrutiny. Thousands of women across the United…

News
November 9, 2024

Shubham Malhotra launches LawStrings Management., A New-Age Business Development Consulting Firm for the Global Legal Industry

The legal industry welcomes a new force in business development consulting with the launch of LawStrings Management, Founded by Shubham Malhotra,…

Law Firm & In-house UpdatesNews
September 30, 2024

Latham Advises Astorg Philanthropy Investments on Series A Fundraising of InHeart

Latham & Watkins has advised Astorg Philanthropy Investments (API) in the €11 million Series A funding round of InHeart, a…

News
June 29, 2024

Aumirah announces Comprehensive Newsletter Series on Key Legal Topics

Aumirah, a leading law firm in India’s IP sector, announces the launch of a series of newsletters aimed at providing…

News
June 14, 2024

For over 10 years, Legal Desire provides credible legal industry updates and insights across the globe.

  • About
  • Contact Us
  • Legal Marketing Service for Law Firms and Lawyers
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms & Condition
  • Cancellation/Refund Policy

Follow US: 

Legal Desire Media & Insights

For Submissions/feedbacks/sponsorships/advertisement/syndication: office@legaldesire.com

Legal Desire Media & Insights 2023

✖
Cleantalk Pixel

Removed from reading list

Undo
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Register Lost your password?