NEWSLETTER

Sign up to read weekly email newsletter

11 years 🥳 of Publication

Legal Desire Media and Insights
Donate
Search
  • Law Firm & In-house Updates
  • Deals
  • Interviews
  • Insight
  • Read to know
  • Courses
Reading: State Vs. Sudhanshu Bansal
Share
Aa
Legal Desire Media and InsightsLegal Desire Media and Insights
  • Law Firm & In-house Updates
  • Deals
  • Interviews
  • Insight
  • Read to know
  • Courses
Search
  • Law Firm & In-house Updates
  • Deals
  • Interviews
  • Insight
  • Read to know
  • Courses
Follow US
Legal Desire Media & Insights
Home » Blog » State Vs. Sudhanshu Bansal
Judgments

State Vs. Sudhanshu Bansal

By Legal Desire 3 Min Read
Share

The case was registered by the Economic Offence Wing of Delhi Police on the basis of a complaint from the Register of Companies, New Delhi, which mentions the names of four companies, namely (1) M / s Goldmine Buildcon Pvt. Ltd (2) M / s Skyline Metal and Alloys Pvt. Ltd (3) M / s Sun Vision Agencies Pvt. Ltd and (4) M / s Infolance Software Solutions Ltd., for allegedly donating 50 lakhs each to the Aam Aadmi party in April 2014. The ROC alleges that all four companies are bogus and that these companies received huge amount of money in the form of an “issue premium amount”, but the source of the money was not disclosed.

The allegations against Mr. Sudhanshu Bansal are that he used to establish shell companies by acquiring DIN on the basis of false documents and photographs. The Shell companies created were used for money laundering, revenue operations and other illegal activities.

Partners of Justum Legal, Advocate Ayush Jain and Tushar Thakur appeared on behalf of Mr. Sudhanshu Bansal and argued that Mr. Sudhanshu Bansal is a CA with 18 years of experience. Since the FIR is registered, Mr. Bansal has regularly joined the investigation as and when called by the Investigating officer. The documents and the Laptop was already seized by the Investigation Officer in 2015 only when the FIR got registered. Further it was submitted that neither he is the author of the forged documents or the morphed photographs, nor the documents which were alleged to be forged were uploaded by Mr. Bansal. By concluding their arguments it is submitted that Mr. Bansal is a person with deep roots in society, has clean antecedents and has no flight risk.

Hon’ble Session judge while granting bail to Mr. Bansal observed that during the prolonged investigation there was no evidence collected by the Investigation Officer that Mr. Bansal has any link with other accused persons Further it was observed by the Ld. Judge that one does not know as to how alleged forged documents came in the possession of accused and thus, very vital link in the chain of circumstances sought to be built up by prosecution is missing. Further Accused has been in custody for 20 days and IO has not obtained IP address of computer by which forged documents were uploaded.

Further it is observed that The only allegation against accused is that he got the DIN form of Deepak Aggarwal submitted under digital signatures of Sudhanshu Bansal. The natural conclusion is that accused is no-more required for investigation.

Accordingly the bail is granted to Mr. Sudhanshu Bansal

You Might Also Like

The Polo/Lauren Company L.P. was granted a stay on operation of an order vacating ad-interim injunction of Tis Hazari District Court on 07th November 2023, by the Delhi High Court

Aditya Birla restrained by Delhi High Court from Infringing Trademark registered by Under Armour

Guilt Of Appellant For Murder Of Deceased Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt Supported By Circumstantial Evidence By Prosecution: Delhi HC

Supreme Court of India upholds validity of certain provisions of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA)

Committee of Creditors of Educomp Solutions Ltd. v. Ebix Singapore Pvt. Ltd: Case Note

Subscribe

Subscribe to our newsletter to get our newest articles instantly!

Don’t miss out on new posts, Subscribe to newsletter Get our latest posts and announcements in your inbox.

Sign Up For Daily Newsletter

Be keep up! Get the latest breaking news delivered straight to your inbox.

Don’t miss out on new posts, Subscribe to newsletter Get our latest posts and announcements in your inbox.

By signing up, you agree to our Terms of Use and acknowledge the data practices in our Privacy Policy. You may unsubscribe at any time.
Legal Desire September 15, 2020
Share this Article
Facebook Twitter Email Copy Link Print
Leave a comment Leave a comment

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

YOU MAY ALSO LIKE

The Polo/Lauren Company L.P. was granted a stay on operation of an order vacating ad-interim injunction of Tis Hazari District Court on 07th November 2023, by the Delhi High Court

Brief Background The appellant, The Polo/Lauren Company L.P., filed the appeal before the Delhi High Court against the order dated…

Judgments
November 16, 2023

Aditya Birla restrained by Delhi High Court from Infringing Trademark registered by Under Armour

Two famous brands - Under Armour and Aditya Birla recently had a dispute before the Delhi High Court regarding their…

JudgmentsNews
May 4, 2023

Guilt Of Appellant For Murder Of Deceased Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt Supported By Circumstantial Evidence By Prosecution: Delhi HC

While setting aside all layers of doubt on when guilt of appellant for murder can be presumed, the Delhi High…

Judgments
November 19, 2022

Supreme Court of India upholds validity of certain provisions of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA)

The top court of India has upheld almost all the stringent provisions of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA)…

JudgmentsNews
July 27, 2022

For over 10 years, Legal Desire provides credible legal industry updates and insights across the globe.

  • About
  • Contact Us
  • Legal Marketing Service for Law Firms and Lawyers
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms & Condition
  • Cancellation/Refund Policy

Follow US: 

Legal Desire Media & Insights

For Submissions/feedbacks/sponsorships/advertisement/syndication: office@legaldesire.com

Legal Desire Media & Insights 2023

✖
Cleantalk Pixel

Removed from reading list

Undo
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Register Lost your password?